Originally Posted by blaise
There's a difference in the kind of language they use.
For instance, when someone like NewChief takes a liberal stance on an issue I normally consider his language to be conversational and not malice-filled. Then when a middle of the roader like yourself take the Democrat side I can usually count on the language to be sort of clownish and not to be taken too seriously.
The content of the messages might be in the same ballpark, but one message is spoken by someone that most people can respect, the other by someone most people dismiss as a sort of jackass.
I'm not sure what to make of most of that gibberish, but it didn't seem very Christian-like. Or maybe it was.
They can use whatever kind of langauge they wish--it still comes down to the same thing. Non-believers are going to hell. Sure, some keep that thought more private than others. Doesn't make them any different in reality.