View Single Post
Old 02-21-2013, 02:25 PM   #120
KC native KC native is offline
Banned
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Casino cash: $49339
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu View Post
The graph in post 77 seems to indicate that the poverty level goes down after the Reagan tax cuts, up after the Bush I tax increase, down after the Clinton tax increase, and then up after the Bush II tax decrease. What that tells me is that tax cuts and increases aren't the driving factor for poverty levels (and by implication, the size of the middle class).

But for the purpose of answering your original question, during the period between 1982 and 1989, in the aftermath of the Reagan tax cuts, income inequality was growing but there was a pretty steady decline in the poverty rate (and by implication, an increase in the size of the middle class).
Being above the poverty line does not equate to being middle class. Your deductions are haphazard, nonsensical, and filtered through the spooge Grover Norquist left in your eye.
Posts: 24,951
KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.KC native has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.
  Reply With Quote