View Single Post
Old 02-21-2013, 01:30 PM   #125
Loneiguana Loneiguana is offline
Veteran
 
Loneiguana's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Springfield
Casino cash: $33026
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu View Post
The graph in post 77 seems to indicate that the poverty level goes down after the Reagan tax cuts, up after the Bush I tax increase, down after the Clinton tax increase, and then up after the Bush II tax decrease. What that tells me is that tax cuts and increases aren't the driving factor for poverty levels (and by implication, the size of the middle class).

But for the purpose of answering your original question, during the period between 1982 and 1989, in the aftermath of the Reagan tax cuts, income inequality was growing but there was a pretty steady decline in the poverty rate (and by implication, an increase in the size of the middle class).
You completely rewrite history to ignore Reagan raising taxes and closer look shows that all that happened only after he did.
Posts: 3,608
Loneiguana would the whole thing.Loneiguana would the whole thing.Loneiguana would the whole thing.Loneiguana would the whole thing.Loneiguana would the whole thing.Loneiguana would the whole thing.Loneiguana would the whole thing.Loneiguana would the whole thing.Loneiguana would the whole thing.Loneiguana would the whole thing.Loneiguana would the whole thing.
  Reply With Quote