Thread: Chiefs Nick Foles News
View Single Post
Old 02-23-2013, 10:55 AM   #65
suds79 suds79 is offline
MVP
 
suds79's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $5111
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan View Post
It's becoming crystal clear. The Chiefs are targeting Nick Foles,


The Kansas City Star considers the Chiefs "unlikely" to use the No. 1 overall pick on a quarterback.
It's becoming crystal clear. The Chiefs are targeting Nick Foles, and Alex Smith as an apparent fallback option, and they're likely to use the No. 1 pick on free agent Branden Albert's replacement. The Star does anticipate Kansas City potentially taking a quarterback in the later rounds. Miami of Ohio's Zac Dysert and Arkansas' Tyler Wilson would fit Andy Reid's West Coast scheme. West Virginia's Geno Smith is likely to be available for Jacksonville at No. 2. Feb 23 - 12:48 PM
You know I can get over not taking a QB #1. I think they should but I could get over it.

What I couldn't get over is letting a good LT go when you have plenty of money only to spend the #1 overall pick to replace him.

We're 2-14. Have plenty of needs and the Chiefs are going to create a need and use the #1 overall pick on that need?

It just doesn't make sense... At all. That's stupid and would be bad management.
Posts: 5,748
suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.
  Reply With Quote