Thanks for a more substantive response than LOLízers.
Originally Posted by La literatura
I'm more interested in something credible that supports the OP. That's generally how claims work, and for good reason, otherwise we spend our time in a futile chase to prove a negative.
Here's the original source: http://modernsurvivalblog.com/govern...treet-sweeper/
You'll notice it's completely unsourced. Here's the Navistar Defense report: http://www.navistardefense.com/Navis.../newsandevents
Do you see where the Survivalist blog makes the jump? Their argument is roughly:
P1: Navistar makes vehicles for military (Navistar report)
P2: Military is drawing down troops in Afghanistan (general knowledge)
P3: Homeland Security is buying the vehicles from military (unsourced)
C: These tanks are going to be used on American streets against citizens
Iím not sure what you think youíve got with the bolded. Itís company reporting on trade shows.
I have made no inference as to the intended use of these vehicles but since we can now acknowledge that DHS is indeed buying them I think the expense of it and their intended use are legitimate topics of discussion.