[ndws]

Originally Posted by nstygma

the report says 48%, not 60 or 70
the report does not state that pit bulls make up 3.3% of the population, but that 3.3% of the dogs for sale in June 2011 in online or newspaper ads were pit bulls,

also, the reports blames an average of 11 deaths per year on pit bulls.
and its conclusion:

For the same reason, it is sheer foolishness to encourage people to regard pit bull
terriers and Rottweilers as just dogs like any other, no matter how much they may
behave like other dogs under ordinary circumstances.Temperament is not the issue, nor is it even relevant. What is relevant is
actuarial risk. If almost any other dog has a bad moment, someone may get bitten, but
will not be maimed for life or killed, and the actuarial risk is accordingly reasonable. If a
pit bull terrier or a Rottweiler has a bad moment, often someone is maimed or killed--
and that has now created off-the-chart actuarial risk, for which the dogs as well as their
victims are paying the price.
Pit bulls and Rottweilers are accordingly dogs who not only must be handled with
special precautions, but also must be regulated with special requirements appropriate to
the risk they may pose to the public and other animals, if they are to be kept at all

Interesting. So, if you own a dog that **could** be aggressive, its recommended that the dog be handled with special precautions? You mean responsibility by the owner? Not spam breeding the shit out of them and giving them to every dickwad who wants to toughen their image?

I'm guessing some people think its ok to turn their 15 yr old with a learner's permit to just drive their Ferrari. I would have to think that might yield some unsavory results too. Ban pit bulls. Ban guns. Bubble wrap the whole world for the irresponsible, stupid, and lazy.