Originally Posted by DaFace
Sure, that's reasonable. But there's a big difference in "You know, I'm skeptical that Alex Smith will improve to the point that he will lead us to the Super Bowl" and "OMFG ALEX SMITH IS WORSE THAN CASSEL. **** THIS TEAM!!11!"
Maybe that's because some people aren't skeptical but have actually formed a hard stance, and there aint shit wrong with that.
And if you were to look at pure numbers, yes, Alex Smith is worse than Matt Cassel.
That's not MY opinion, but it's easy to see how someone can come to that conclusion.
The people who say that have a valid argument, whether you or anyone else want to hear it or not.