Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu
1. It's not surprising that his critique of Barkley is a little better than that of Smith since he gave him a higher grade.
2. Despite that higher grade, he doesn't treat Barkley with kid gloves. You're imagining that. Read these negatives again and tell me where he's making excuses:
3. Doesn't mention arm strength? Go back to 2. and read it again.
4. I don't know why you're trying so hard to see ulterior motives, but it seems to be screwing up your reading ability.
|
He clearly uses the O-Line as an excuse in his overview. He compares Barkley to DREW BREES while comparing Geno to Akili Smith. What the **** does Geno have in common with Akili Smith? Comparing him to Akili smith is automatically putting the bust tag on him when he shares nothing in common with Akili aside from his last name and skin color.
What the **** has Matt Barkely ever done to draw comparisons to Drew Brees?
Geno got absolutely destroyed in this review, using very harsh verbage. There isn't anything nearly as harsh in Barkley's review.
There is a reason why this review is so heavily debated. But go ahead and pretend that it's a fair analysis. Go ahead and continue white knighting a guy who has already been proven to be disingenuous in his scouting reports.