Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
I'm not quoting the rest of your post because it all seemed to hinge on this loose piece of shit that you think invalidates me somehow. If you were paying attention, I already brought up this point. Obviously you weren't, though. The rest of the post is a gigantic ****ing lie that completely ignores what I'm trying to say.
Second of all, back the **** up. I only ever responded to you because you were extolling JustPassinBy's terrible and fallacious post. I'm not getting into a QB debate with someone like you. I thought it would be okay just to focus on that one argument, but clearly even that's beyond your reach.
Explain how I made JustPassinBy's argument misleading and off subject.
I'll wait.
|
Explain? Sure.
A/B comment about all of your friends building successful teams by drafting a QB in the first round. That simply is not true.
Point explained, I rest my case.
Off subject? Easy!
Suggesting that the only way to improve is by doing something we haven't done, IE, drafting a QB in the first round, EVEN IF WE DO NOT NEED ONE OR HE IS NOT BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAVE.
That, is illogical. IE, lacking Logic.
Yet I'm the illogical one. Oh heavens SNR, you're smart, but you are so blindly opinionated that you often look stupid and foolish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
Then what the ****'s the point of bringing up impact with the 1.1 pick and then listing the positions you did? Sure as **** looked like you said, "The Chiefs can find an immediate impact player at any of these positions."
It's either that or you're backpedaling something fierce. I'm going to guess that's what you really meant.
|
Or, and watch as I unveil the grand scheme here.
I simply named off guys we could pick in the first round that offer an upside over, whether we took them at 1.1 or 1.32, I didn't specify, nor did I need to.