Quote:
Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess
Yeah because I'm usually wrong.
I got these same facepalms years ago when I told everyone Carson Palmer was ridiculously overrated and everyone thought he was so AMAZING.
Just like when I said the Lakers wouldn't challenge for a title this year.
A TEAM WITH KOBE BRYANT AND STEVE NASH ON IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
what happened to the Celtics when Rondo went down? They got better.
Sometimes a star player isn't the key to a team winning...since Mike D'Antoni doesn't know how to coach a team with a Kobe Bryant.
I could be wrong about the Lakers...but I thought all along they'd be a better team with either no Nash or no Kobe. They play better when Nash isn't in the lineup, and I suspect they'll play better with a healthy Nash and no Kobe...
since, you know, they aren't trying to play two conflicting styles of basketball with one basketball.
|
I agree they have been trying to play 2 conflicting styles of basketball because of D'Antoni. What i don't agree with is that they will be better without their best scorer. Who is going to make up for Kobe's 30-40 points?
Are they suddenly going to play better defense without Kobe?