Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence
What? Trading him after the top 3 tackles go off the board? Why?
If we take a LT at 1.1.....
|
That's only IF we do go LT at 1 and even then we're trading a very solid player for a prospect.
It's not an even trade off.
The only reason I see for taking LT at 1 is to attempt to create a position of overwhelming strength on both ends and to cover your azz just in case the deal can't be worked out with Albert.
We take a Joekel at 1 and play him at RT for a year he gets experience without having that huge target on his back, add a big talent at our biggest weak spot on the O line, and Albert can't be worked out we just slide him over to LT.
I don't like the move at all if it's a 1 for 1. I like the move if we add that talent and have options for the future...