View Single Post
Old 04-28-2013, 06:28 PM   #207
Mav Mav is offline
XBOX GT MAVS ACE
 
Mav's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Casino cash: $10019303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice View Post
That's so much bullshit.

Our defense is not nearly as good.

I do agree the offense is close, but this team is going to need to average 24 PPG to have a winning season.

Alex Smith has NEVER delivered that.
Okay. Look CLay. you do realize that prior to the start of the 2011 season, that the 49ers defense, wasnt the 49ers defense? Do you see what im getting at?

We cut Clements, and brought in Carlos Rogers, who was GARBAGE with the redskins. Correct? Hi Sean Smith.

We signed Donte Whitner who was not even a thought at bringing back to Buffalo. Hi Dunta Robinson.

Our front 7 was okay, but people were FLABBERGASTED that we resigned Ray Mc to a 5 year 25 million dollar deal, and people were scared crapless that we just let aubryo franklin leave, because well, Isaac Soap was just mediocre.

See if this rings a bell. In 2010 we never blitzed. We were a base cover 4 team that rarely got pressure and our secondary got torched. How closely does that ring true about the chiefs last year?

The 49ers then brought in an attacking style defense with Vic Fangio, and WOW, ALL OF A SUDDEN, OUR DEFENSE DIDNT SUCK, even though, when you factor in that all we did to the defense really was make lateral moves with rogers, and whitner, and drafted aldon smith. Thats it.

I stated this too, that the new guy you brought in, is fundamentally different that crennel, and that pressure bursts pipes. You guys are going to unleash hali, and houston, and its going to improve your defense.

Thats what I mean.....The 49ers defense, that inserted also an unknown in Bowman, whitner and rogers, was helped tremendously by our pass rush.

Same will happen for the chiefs......I believe anyways.
__________________
Resident Browns fan

I’m not here to argue about Alex Smith. Fastest Ignore user on CP
Posts: 18,683
Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mav is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote