Originally Posted by Brainiac
JFC, are you really this stupid? Those weren't risky picks. Those were SAFE picks.
The closest comparison I can think of is St. Louis insisting upon using the #1 overall pick on Sam Bradford. The jury is still out on that, but the Rams haven't won dick yet with Bradford.
no, they weren't
and no one on this board wanted them or would have
they are both the ****ing definition of what Chiefs fan define as risky
they sure as hell weren't "Luck or RGIII"...which is the stated reason we couldn't draft a QB this year