Originally Posted by luv
Because taxpayers often end up helping pay for the "consequences".
Does that mean that if, for example, anal sex leads to increased incidence of some kind of medical condition that impacts our taxpayers through healthcare expenses that it would be legitimate to reinstate anti-sodomy laws?
"Well, it is one thing for Bill Clinton to say, I feel your pain. It is another thing for Barack Obama to say I feel your pain that I have caused." - George Will