Originally Posted by BucEyedPea
ALL history telling is based on viewpoints. Revisionist is a bogus term for this, as it implies a fabrication in any changes. Oftentimes, it's adding information that has been omitted. Afterall, history is always written by the victors.
In your case on this thread, it's ignoring 200 years of generally-agreed facts. Not even Rush Limbaugh would follow the arguments you've put forth on this thread, sorry to say.