Quote:
Originally Posted by J Diddy
Yet in 3 years that is what to be expected from them in real life. Furthermore, you don't anything about the packets, the manner in which this teacher teaches or anything outside of a 2 minute youtube clip from a mouthy kid with no rebuttal from the teacher. You know nothing of the teachers funding, the schools curriculum, nor the background of the children in the room. For all that is known that could be detention.
Point being, I will concede that the child had a point that not all students learn the same and in an all things being equal classroom he would be somewhat justified for his disagreement. However, you must concede that you have absolutely no clue as to the context of what he speaks and can't possibly attest to the truthfulness as to the perfect scenario I illustrated above.
|
I'll concede that i don't know the context of the video. But that doesn't change the truthfulness of the speech, which is that kids learn more from an engaging teacher.
Was he wrong for his outburst? Yes.
But you don't know the context either, so why dismiss what he has to say?
He even states in the video that the teacher had stated weeks ago that she was there to simply collect a paycheck.
So if we don't know the story, why dismiss it?
Why are you trying to pick a side instead of taking it for its face value?