Quote:
Originally Posted by kepp
Interesting, because my main use would be to take pictures of my daughters during their gymnastics events. However, for the entry level price range I'm looking at ($600 - $800'ish), it seems like Nikon shoots faster and has more AF points (which I've read is important for fast-moving pictures). Do you agree with that, or do you think the Canon entry level units are better for sports?
|
You'll never notice the difference in the speed.
My Nikon shoots 8 frames per second. My buddies Canon shoots 10 frames per second.
Both are plenty enough.
When I get done shooting a game I usually have almost 2000 images to sort through.