Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain Man
Interesting analysis.
If you think you only need 42-49, then do you put more money in those guys or are your last roster spots speculative developmental guys?
|
Me, personally? I don't think the value is there to hold developmental guys as it stands. The burden of one whiff hurts because of the contract implications, why would I risk it repeatedly?
My money will be spent on my best players. The fewer of them I have to field, the more they all get. That's why if the 34 requires one fewer named player, I'll move to it.