Originally Posted by Pawnmower
I apologize for sounding angry, man.
Well I am angry..but mainly because I have not heard a single person argue intelligently against:
-getting more people in the insurance pool
-getting healthier and younger people in the insurance pool (improving the demo of the pool)
-explain why exchanges are a bad idea
-explain why more choice will be bad
-explain why Obama care will 'cost more' per person than treating sick people in emergency rooms
-explain why prevention would be more expensive than cures
_explain why the cost of rising health care is somehow Obama's fault when the real meat of this program hasn't had a chance to work yet
-explain how a system where you can go ANY TIME (using ambulances like Taxis, to get painkillers) to an emergency room to get an insanely expensive treatment (currently) is better than Obama care
So far it is pretty much just been 'Obama sux' and I do agree with that....
But that really has no bearing on this issue which is more similar to Romney's idea than anything else...
Sorry to come off angry but until a poster comes out and actually rebuts these things intelligently, **** them..I shit on them.
I'm with you, with only a couple minor differences, I totally agree and you're largely outlining why the ACA was a necessary reform.
Agreeing with you, of course, is a new thing for me. And it makes me feel a wee bit ill.