Originally Posted by Messier
Could be that these ranking are meaningless.
They really are. They are for lil kids, basically.
There are 5-6 excellent QBs (that still have flaws, but get overhyped) stick around into the mid-high 90's +)
There are over a dozen good QBs (that hover in the mid-low 90's/upper 80's, yet have their occasionally abysmal games)
And then, there are the rest of either unproven, lucky to get into the 80's, flawed but occasionally decent, barely clinging to a job, backups at best and lucky to be a #2.