Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain Man
Aren't the other witnesses viewed as biased since they're part of the dead guy's tribe? And depending on who you believe, active rock chuckers of the dead guy's tribe? If I was on a jury I'd discount them pretty heavily.
|
Yeah, they're going to have a bias, sure.
But who's more likely to lie here? The friends of the dead guy that have literally
nothing on the line (and could potentially be subject to civil liability if the shooter walks and finds a creative plaintiff's attorney) or the dude who's going to jail for the rest of his life?
It's about weighing respective credibility at that point. If you have to choose one party or the other that's
more likely to lie, aren't you going to go with the shooter? He damn sure has more riding on it.
The Jury's going to look at it initially just as you are - that's why the prosecutor has to rehab their credibility without overtly doing so.
In a he said/she said kind of case, it's all about relative biases. Is it enough to convict? Probably not - but given that there's unquestionably a dead guy and the shooter unquestionably shot him, the order of the story is all that's going to matter here. As such, determining the credibility of those witnesses is going to be the key thing for the jurors and the major job of the prosecution.