Originally Posted by patteeu
Romney would have had a coherent policy based on American strategic interests and he'd have already laid the groundwork for both domestic support and international cooperation.
That's not my point. My point is he'd be for military intervention and probably even more. I don't give a rats ass if he's more coherent or organized about his plans for mass murder. All you're arguing is "how" when I am arguing "do."
“Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government’s purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” — James Madison