Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection
No, that would just be another bullshit strawman you constructed instead of actually addressing the points I made about the aesthetic quality of the Spurs brand of basketball. That comparison to KU backups is still laughable.
In my experience, anybody who can't appreciate what Pop does with that team generally is either jealous of their success (many fans of other Western Conference teams are) or ignorant about what they do (like I used to be when I was kid who didn't know any better). In your case, it seems to be both.
Ironic statement coming from the guy who repeatedly suggested he needs NBA stars to be entertained by the great game of basketball.  |
This is really simple to understand. I'm shocked you're not getting this.
Appreciation isn't in the picture. You put it there. I can appreciate the hard work and intricacy of soccer without wanting to watch it. I can appreciate different types of art (since you're on the aesthetic kick and all) while vastly preferring other types.
There is no ****ing aesthetic quality. That's being a judgmental asshole and holding up a standard that YOU made up. Spurs-brand basketball is the be-all end-all of basketball, and the closer a team plays to the Spurs means the more "aesthetic" and beautiful and better product they are as an entertainment commodity.
Not only did you impose that arbitrary standard, but you're saying people who don't appreciate are either jealous or stupid.
I pointed out it's not jealousy, because I found the Lakers and Celtics a few years ago, the Thunder, and the Heat to be palatable and good teams to watch. So you're calling it an issue of basketball intelligence.
Which is why I'm telling you to go **** your sister. It's nonsensical and asinine.