01-13-2011, 06:32 AM
|
#877
|
MVP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Overland Park
Casino cash: $10020882
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rick
Here's an interesting take from a guy known as "Znu" on Slashdot:
|
I like this response, too:
Quote:
1. In addition to supporting H.264, Chrome currently bundles an embedded version of Adobe’s closed source and proprietary Flash Player plugin. If H.264 support is being removed to “enable open innovation”, will Flash Player support be dropped as well? If not, why?
2. Android currently supports H.264. Will this support be removed from Android? If not, why not?
3. YouTube uses H.264 to encode video. Presumably, YouTube will be re-encoding its entire library using WebM. When this happens, will YouTube’s support for H.264 be dropped, to “enable open innovation”? If not, why not?
4. Do you expect companies like Netflix, Amazon, Vimeo, Major League Baseball, and anyone else who currently streams H.264 to dual-encode all of their video using WebM? If not, how will Chrome users watch this content other than by resorting to Flash Player’s support for H.264 playback?
5. Who is happy about this?
|
|
Posts: 19,908
|
|