Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman
Why would we need to get rid of back up QB?
|
I wouldn't consider a QB I pick at the top of the 2nd, "back up." I consider him insurance in case the #1 busts. If they don't bust then we will have 2 high salaried players and will keep only one. Other teams will know that. The scenario I replied to was Geno in the 1st and Wilson in the 2nd. The author was suggesting that we then could trade Wilson away for someone's 1st.
And BTW, until further data, I consider Wilson in the 2nd a much wiser pick than Geno in the 1st. Unless Geno in the 1st is a result of trade down and Dorsey has raped a team out of a bunch of draft choices for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz
with the new draft salary slotting there wouldn't be any NEED to get rid of a QB. It would totally be a voluntary/value move.
|
I just strongly doubt Dorsey will go QB 1 & 2.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz
I have Geno/Smith as my #1/#2
|
WHAAA???!!!