Quote:
Originally Posted by DoucheMcCloud
Anytime there's an "Alternate version" or a "Remaster", it's a money grab.
That will change when, as Under EJ has so expertly detailed, when 3D actually offers something of value (as in "Shot in 3D" and so forth) as opposed to a conversion.
But to add to your quote, I couldn't care less if Leterrier hated the film because of what was taken from him or due to a 3D conversion: IMO, it was a pointless exercise that pales to the original from 1981.
In other words, it was crap and seeing it in 3D most likely enhanced it's crap factor.
|
Admittedly, I'm not a fan of 3D. I wear glasses and I don't like wearing the shades over them. I'm also of the philosophy that a good film doesn't need 3D to enhance it. A bad film can perhaps be made more tolerable by it though.
I did see Epic over the weekend with my daughter and it looked solid in 3D. I think 3D works better for animation than it does for live action.
Posted via Mobile Device