Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
The last QB taken #1 overall to sit any games his rookie season was Eli Manning in 2004.
2004.
If you don't believe it would be a P.R. disaster for them to take a QB #1 and sit him for "a year or two", you're completely out of touch.
****, they're facing an uphill battle with the fanbase if they take a QB #1 overall over Joeckel! If they choose a QB and he sits for two years, the guy won't be able to show his face in KC area.
All you'll see and hear at the stadium and on the local talk radio will be "Bust" and "See, this is why you never take a QB in the first round. It's too risky".
No way that happens.
|
I really do love that two SoCal guys are arguing over the emotional climate of Kansas City, but let's not let that stop us.
2004 is - historically speaking - not that long ago. And the fact that the last QB to go 1.1 and sit has won TWO SUPER BOWLS only further enhances my point.
The year before, Carson Palmer went first overall and didn't play his rookie season.
A lot of QBs start their whole rookie season, and it can absolutely crush them.
Obviously, guys have to neither start nor sit their rookie season to be successful, so I don't buy into the theory that the Chiefs "absolutely" have to do one or the other.