Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
I disagree.
The O-lines were comparable and Daniel's defenses were occasionally inconsistent, but certainly not obviously worse than Gabbert's.
The secondaries were equally awful. In fact, the Daniel teams have much better playmakers back there with Pig Brown and William Moore.
The D-Lines with Daniel were just as good as they had Hood plugging the middle while making things easier for Sulak, etc... No, he didn't have Aldon Smith, but he did have Hood and some solid ends in their own right.
The LB corps were comparable, but Daniel's defenses get a slight edge because of what Spoon was able to do out there.
I just don't see Daniel having a far superior defense.
|
I don't know how I could possibly disagree more, especially about the defense. MU was top 10 in scoring defense this season. Daniel's teams were the DV Chiefs.