Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
I usually respect your opinion. But rgIII does the same things geno does as a pocket passer (in my opinion, better). But rgIII also has ability to extend plays if he can't make a lightning fast read in a way geno is athletically incapable of.
Genos a good prospect. But sac is saying he is as good if not better prospect than both luck and rgIII. And that is just crazy talk.
|
You are a dipshit whose opinions are couched in really nicely articulated dipshittery.
Geno Smith's pocket awareness is more advanced at this point in his career than RGIII's was.
He is not as athletically gifted, but he has the mobility to extend plays with his legs, and is better at keeping his eyes downfield than any college QB I've seen in years, except Luck.
RGIII extended plays, but a lot of what he did was dumpoffs after breaking containment, while Smith throws the ball all over the yard, because his vision is better downfield.
And your whole "RGIII is less likely to bust because he can run" is some of the dumbest shit ever.
Michael Vick never busted for that reason, but there's no way in hell I want that type of QB.
RGIII is not going to bust because he is a smart kid that will excel as a pocket passer.
Geno Smith will excel for that same reason.
The short of this is that you are a blowhard dumbass.