View Single Post
Old 08-11-2014, 07:22 AM   #5
BucEyedPea BucEyedPea is offline
Bucs, Pats, Noles
 
BucEyedPea's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: None of your business
Casino cash: $70063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochise View Post
Like a lot of us have been saying for a long time, we sure would be a lot better off if Clinton had won in 08 instead of Obama. As much as conservatives disliked the Clintons for this policy or that one, or for the parade of corruption and scandals, at least they are basically competent and qualified for the office. You wouldn't have what we have now, which is a frightening look at what the world looks like without any leadership.

The Obama doctrine, which seems to be to alienate historic allies and lead from behind, act against our national interest, and apathetically leave vacuums for dangerous elements to fill, basically has been a trial of sorts of many far left foreign policy ideas, and we can see in miniature where those things would lead.

Giving some random guy off the street the oval office isn't such a good idea, it turns out.
If you think we'd be better off under Hillary, then I have a Bridge to sell ya'.

There's not a dimes difference between the two parties are that level.
__________________
Posts: 100,316
BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote