Thread: MU ****The official NEW new conference realignment thread.****
View Single Post
Old 02-18-2013, 06:58 PM   #6216
mnchiefsguy mnchiefsguy is offline
MVP
 
mnchiefsguy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Casino cash: $3496206
Quote:
Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade View Post
After A&M, not after Missouri, as Neinas was still trying to keep MU in the fold with the concessions.

Its always so black and white (or is that gold?) for you MU fans. UT never wanted to leave. OU did, for whatever silly reason, OU tried to play a power move against UT. The PAC didn't want OU and OSU, they wanted OU and UT. So, UT strung the process out, and when it became clear OU wasn't going to get in on its own merits, UT told the PAC they were no longer interested. Funny how this MU fan sees all the wrong in this, but nothing about their flirtations only the year before.
Not sure what kind of crack you have been smoking...but UT did not tell the Pac they were no longer interested...the PAC told UT they were no longer interested based on the structure of the LHN.
__________________
Posts: 10,122
mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.mnchiefsguy is obviously part of the inner Circle.