Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy
Yeah, I'm not in contention so I really don't care a whole lot, but that trade may have been borderline veto worthy. Crazy stuff can happen, but that may have just handed him a nice chunk of change.
|
Are you kidding? This is two 3-0 teams making a trade. Obviously there is no collusion, so why on earth should this have even been considered veto worthy. The only way a trade should ever be vetoed is if there is suspected collusion. Clearly that isn't the case here.