Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus
Yeah, that was me  and I think that's obvious now. Your jaws HAVE to be sore as shit right now. Seriously, you've been fellating this guy for the past 7 hours..
Wilson over Rodgers for one game? Come on, man. I could understand if you were staring a franchise because Wilson's like 6 years his junior, but he's NOT better than Rodgers right now.
What? The Packers have a shit team outside of Rodgers and those receivers (one could make the argument that Rodgers makes them look better than they are).
Their run game is non-existant and the defense might as well lay down on every drive. Meanwhile, Wilson was blessed with the best defense in the league and one of the better RBs. His receivers are below average, in my opinion, but they're serviceable. |
I was just talking offense. You're right, the packers defense is terrible. But those receivers made some great plays last night, as they always do. And the newfound running game almost seemed to hurt Rodgers' game than enhance it.
I still would take the Packers receivers(Greg Jennings, James Jones, Jordy Nelson, Jermichael Finley) over what seattle has (Sidney Rice, Golden Tate, Zach Miller). And I'd take Mccarthy whoever Seattle has. Fact is, Matt ****ing Flynn looked like an all-pro with the same supporting cast, and that has to count for something.
Maybe it's just the fact that I've been studying for 10 hours and I'm going a little insane.