View Single Post
Old 10-31-2012, 06:48 AM   #4323
Braincase Braincase is offline
Banned
 
Braincase's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pond> Me <Barn
Casino cash: $11298284
I pulled this from a Phog.net post. The purpose was to illustrate the overall team improvement in various aspects of the game.

KU 2011 (Rank)/KU 2012 (Rank)
Rushing Defense: 239.08 (117)/188.63 (90)
Pass Defense: 277.33 (110)/230.13 (58)
Total Defense: 516.42 (120)/418.75 (81)
Scoring Defense: 43.75 (120)/30.13 (83)
Passes Intercepted: 8 (93)/9 (33)
Pass Efficiency Defense: 164.67 (118)/135.14 (78)
Fumbles Recovered: 10 (57)/8 (35)
Turnovers Gained: 18 (91)/17 (31)
Tackles for Loss: 50 (117)/34 (114)
Sacks: 10 (116)/8 (113)
First Downs Allowed: 306 (118)/159 (52)
3rd Down Efficiency: 51.3 (116)/37.25 (45)
4th Down Efficiency: 64.29 (107)/54.55 (81)
Red Zone Efficiency: 87% (96)/69% (13)

Percent Improvement from 2011 to 2012
Rushing Defense: 21%
Pass Defense: 17%
Total Defense: 19%
Scoring Defense: 31%
Passes Intercepted: 41%
Pass Efficiency Defense: 18%
Fumbles Recovered: 16%
Turnovers Gained: 15%
Tackles for Loss: 2%
Sacks: 17%
First Downs Allowed: 22%
3rd Down Efficiency: 17%
4th Down Efficiency: 15%
Red Zone Efficiency: 21%

The Kansas fans for the most part were just looking for improvement... well, here ya go!
__________________
BrainCase
Posts: 15,429
Braincase is too fat/Omaha.Braincase is too fat/Omaha.Braincase is too fat/Omaha.Braincase is too fat/Omaha.Braincase is too fat/Omaha.Braincase is too fat/Omaha.Braincase is too fat/Omaha.Braincase is too fat/Omaha.Braincase is too fat/Omaha.Braincase is too fat/Omaha.Braincase is too fat/Omaha.
    Reply With Quote