Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good
Daniel had much better skill players on offense. Gabbert had better everything else, especially defense.
|
I disagree.
The O-lines were comparable and Daniel's defenses were occasionally inconsistent, but certainly not obviously worse than Gabbert's.
The secondaries were equally awful. In fact, the Daniel teams have much better playmakers back there with Pig Brown and William Moore.
The D-Lines with Daniel were just as good as they had Hood plugging the middle while making things easier for Sulak, etc... No, he didn't have Aldon Smith, but he did have Hood and some solid ends in their own right.
The LB corps were comparable, but Daniel's defenses get a slight edge because of what Spoon was able to do out there.
I just don't see Daniel having a far superior defense.