Quote:
Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl
The point is he was already with the franchise when it moved to KC. We've never drafted and developed anyone worth a shit in KC since. Remember the year Croyle was supposed to start and all the talk of how great it is that KC is finally playing and developing a true drafted QB? Then Pioli breaks out the Carl method of team building and pulls the same bullshit with Cassel Carl did for years and years and years and everybody seems to forget, we still haven't drafted and developed a QB. Most likely the situation will end the same way. Carl era QBs were decent but not great and eventually became limiting. None of them looked as bad as Cassell did thru his first ~1.5 yrs starting here, and none of them had as much help in the running game as he's had this year. Even his biggest supporters agree the Casshole isn't a "true franchise QB" which you generally have to draft and develop.
Can you win with him? Yeah, but you could also win with Carl era Qbs.
So basically there's a big disconnect here: Everybody wanted to run Carl out of town for being content with non franchise QBs but now everybody wants to suck Pioli and Cassels dick for doing the same ****ing thing (at a lower level IMO).
|
Wow.
This is what you're going with.
Len Dawson was a franchise QB in KC because he was already with the franchise when the Texans relocated to KC?
Really?
You do know he was roughly the same age when he signed with the Texans as Cassel was when he was traded to the Chiefs?
You do know that he had actually been in the NFL a year longer that Matt Cassel had been in the league?
You do know that for most of his career, there was debate about whether he was actually a QB that could lead the Chiefs, and that he was really not accepted fully by the fan base until the Chiefs won SB IV?
Your whole argument is complete and utter bullshit.
Holy shit.