Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
Barkley would have been the third QB off the board this year, if not the second, if he had come out.
Kiffin has gone full reerun this year. USC was #1 overall by many publications to start the year and they've completely sucked, despite having an enormous amount of NFL talent.
Monte has them playing Cover 2 and read and react defense, which is negating the speed and athleticism of their players. They should be attacking and instead, their waiting around with their thumbs up their asses.
No one knows what the **** Lane is doing each week. For a team that went Toe-To-Toe with Andrew Luck and Stanford last year (among others), they've completely fallen apart offensively, despite the transfer from Penn State of Silas Redd.
They're a cluster****.
My guess is that Barkley has a great combine and a great Pro Day. There is plenty great game film available on him, so he'll be a Top Five QB.
|
Like I said, I don't know too much about USC, but there is one thing that I DO KNOW for sure that USC players are playing the read and react defense/Cover 2, and you are absolutey correct on that they have to be a attacking defense.
I just think the whole thing of selecting another USC QB is a red flag to me, because while that school has produced very good college players, when was the last USC QB that was able to translate their skills in the NFL? I don't think Palmer would fit in that category. Leinhart? Haha... Sanchez? No.
At least, it is to me, a concern.