Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD
Actually these are both VERY good things, yes it could suck a bit more in the short term but you haven't been able to carry yet anyway so you want him to do stupid things that will cause it to be advanced in the courts and get hammered down for dumb regulations.
The presumption that CCW isn't allowed unless explicitly stated is a functional ban on CCW. If businesses decide they want to explicitly deny it I have less issues, their property, their rules.
That said it's a veto, the CCW rules were passed with a veto proof majority, if they want to override it they will. If it doesn't the bill is vetoed and the state is in contempt. Basically his veto has no meaning since they must pass it as he wants it written. It's not the case of no action and the modified bill goes into effect.
It must be passed as he modified it or the veto overridden within 7 days or constitutional carry goes into effect.
|
People seem to think that the General Assembly will override his veto. Outside of the diehard Chicago scumbags, he has almost no support anywhere else in the state, even among fellow Democrats.