Quote:
Originally Posted by comochiefsfan
A “no” vote was a vote to open up the possibility of the teams moving.
If the teams staying was a priority to you then you would’ve voted yes. But since you voted no you’re obviously comfortable with the idea of them leaving.
They’re going to get public money somewhere, and Kansas Citians are going to be taxed on something, no matter what. So all anyone who voted no really did was told the teams that they’re ok with them leaving.
You can keep telling yourself otherwise, but that’s the reality.
|
If they wanted to leave they would have waited closer to when the leases expire and make a deal elsewhere. The vote had nothing to do with them leaving despite whatever some conspiracy theoriest from FL, a guy in Iowa, or central Missouri want to say.