08-01-2014, 04:53 PM
|
#3254
|
Kindness in words...
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Zion
Casino cash: $10025483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspengc8
Pretty much studies now are showing 1g/lb. Some can even argue 1g/lb of lean body mass. I used to eat 300+g a day, since cutting back to around 200-225g day and realized the 300+ wasnt needed at all.
|
Interesting article:
Quote:
• Tarnopolsky et al. (1992) observed no differences in whole body protein synthesis or indexes of lean body mass in strength athletes consuming either 0.64g/lb or 1.10g/lb over a 2 week period. Protein oxidation did increase in the high protein group, indicating a nutrient overload.
• Walberg et al. (1988) found that 0.73g/lb was sufficient to maintain positive nitrogen balance in cutting weightlifters over a 7 day time period.
• Tarnopolsky et al. (1988) found that only 0.37g/lb was required to maintain positive nitrogen balance in elite bodybuilders (over 5 years of experience, possible previous use of androgens) over a 10 day period. 0.45g/lb was sufficient to maintain lean body mass in bodybuilders over a 2 week period. The authors suggested that 0.55g/lb was sufficient for bodybuilders.
• Lemon et al. (1992) found no differences in muscle mass or strength gains in novice bodybuilders consuming either 0.61g/lb or 1.19g/lb over a 4 week period. Based on nitrogen balance data, the authors recommended 0.75g/lb.
• Hoffman et al. (2006) found no differences in body composition, strength or resting hormonal concentrations in strength athletes consuming either 0.77g/lb or >0.91g/lb over a 3 month period.
|
http://bayesianbodybuilding.com/the-...-bodybuilders/
|
Posts: 15,450
|
|