Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
Why don't we turn to my Geno is better than... poll to see if that's actually true.
Most people who voted tended to say that Geno was better than Bradford as a prospect, and I legitimately agree with that. I like him better than Rivers (who sat for his rookie year *gasp*) and Stafford, but people tend to be higher on Stafford than Geno. I can buy that.
In the meantime, it's pretty ****ing stupid to say the top QBs in this class are less than "normal" because Bradford and Rivers are way below normal top QB prospects. I really don't know what Bradford did to tickle your balls coming out of college that Geno does not do.
Let me guess, 'WINZ GAMEZ!!!!!!!111"
Yeah, a lot of good that "winner" mentality from college is doing him now in the pros.
|
What sucks is, this it's my line of thinking as . There can be no higher payoff than successfully picking a QB and doing so locks up franchise success for years on end. When there is no clear cut choice, why not take the chance on the player that could define your career?