|
Kloster:
Chiefs Suck is not the issue. The reaction by some moderator to kick Chiefs Suck WORDS off is what concerns me. I want to know what kind of writing merits removal from this BB.
You, or one of the other moderators, chose to blow up Chiefs Suck’s topics because, in your words, “it became apparent to me that he had no intention to actually converse with the residents here, he became a hit & run troll in my mind” and thus worthy of removal. You said Chiefs Suck was “here only to talk crap.”
What I understand from that is you have certain standards that qualify someone as a “hit and run troll” and are more vague than specific about what are those standards.
I rarely feel compelled to respond simply because someone responds to me, and your quote above suggests that if I choose to simply posts things and NOT respond to responses I become subject to removal. Is that correct? Or do I have to “talk crap” AND also not respond?
“Try worrying a little more about yourself and a little less about the trolls & whether the moderators are doing their jobs & we'll keep you around.” And previously you wrote, “Don't worry about our policies. Quit stirring the ****. Try acting like a welcome guest & maybe we'll have you back sometime.”
The word “we” suggests you were representing the thoughts of other moderators too. Is that true? The words do suggest you don’t like your actions to be questioned and will kick someone based on emotion. If true, let me know so I can tippy-toe around you, okay?
|