Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefshrink
and why "moral relativity" MUST rule your world and "moral absolutes" be avoided at all costs so that you can "feed your flesh" at every whim correct ?
"When you say there's too much evil in this world you assume there's good. When you assume there's good, you assume there's such a thing as a moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil. But if you assume a moral law, you must posit a moral Law Giver, but that's Who you're trying to disprove and not prove. Because if there's no moral Law Giver, there's no moral law. If there's no moral law, there's no good. If there's no good, there's no evil. What is your question?"
—Ravi Zacharias
|
Not moral relativity at all. An immoral action is one that violates the rights of another person. It is a stricter morality than your Christian religion as your own holy book justifies the violation of others rights if someone says that God says its okay.