View Single Post
Old 06-05-2012, 01:38 PM   #8
whoman69 whoman69 is offline
The Master
 
whoman69's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Marion, IA
Casino cash: $10004925
All this banging on the Rams because they are in STL is pretty much senseless. The only loophole in the whole deal is that the stadium has to be in the top 20% of the league, whatever that means. The bar has been raised greatly since the stadium was built less than 20 years ago. The only way to get to that standard would be to pretty much raze it to the ground and rebuild. The stadiums that have pulled ahead of the Rams since were built by rich franchises (Dallas/Washington), cities that hadn't had a new stadium since the 70s, or teams that raped their fanbase to build (Arizona). To ask a city to build a new stadium less than 20 years after pouring out money for another stadium is unfair to that city.


The decision for the Rams to move in the first place was pretty poor since the Raiders also moved and the Rams would have had the city to themselves once again. The Rams were entrenched in LA despite their short history beginning in Cleveland.
__________________
-Watching Eddie Podolak
Quote:
Originally posted by Logical
When the boobs are a bouncin, the Chiefs will be trouncin
What the Raiders fan has said is true, our customs are different. What Al Davis has said is unimportant, and we do not hear his words.
Posts: 23,101
whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
    Reply With Quote