Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy
If you're going to cite poor positional value, then how can you justify taking a RB in the first round?
|
Because the idea that a RB is a poor positional value pick is a fairly novel one.
Just because the last few years has shown a dearth of quality high-round RBs doesn't mean that it's not historically easier to get them from there. If you have a chance to get the best RB in the draft, and arguably the best to come out in several years, at 11 - that's not a poor value at all.
RB is still an incredibly valuable position to fill and fill well.