Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
No, that's not what I'm saying at all.
I'm saying that a franchise QB isn't going to make enough of a difference all by himself.
Some of you seem to think this is a championship-caliber roster just missing a franchise QB.
It's far from that, and 23 wins in 4 years - as many as Cleveland, Buffalo, Oakland, Miami and Jacksonville - who are also missing a QB and according to most don't have the talent we do.
Let's use Oakland again.
Their QB situation has been even worse than ours over the past 4 years.
Coaching has been abysmal. Ownership as well.
98% of this board would say we have a TON more talent than Oakland.
Why do they have more wins in the last 4 years?
Hint: Because we're not as talented a roster as some of you think.
|
If we get a GM or HC that knows their shit and is able to hit on one or two draft picks per year, the talent deficiency is not going to take long to make up at all.
There's work to be done, sure. The point is that if teams like the Colts can draft a QB and get some other good players in the draft/free agency to fill in gaps, why the **** can't we?
Answer: Because we're the Chiefs and nothing ever goes right and we'll always be terrible boo hoo hoo
I'm tired of that ****ing attitude. It's possible to be realistic and still optimistic for the future.