Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing
And I've given consideration to the weather. I'm pretty sure it wasn't even an hour ago posted it. I just don't give nearly as much weight to it as you do. No one expected a 500 yard performance, go ahead and continue making shit up though. An effecient performance woulda been nice.
|
Like I said, if:
16/24
197 yards
2 TDs
0 Ints
163.1 rating
isn't effecient, if that's "falling flat on your face" and if you've "given consideration to the weather," and knowing that a pass TD and a run TD that Geno audibled into were called back due to penalities not caused by Geno, I'd really like to know what your expectations of an nice "efficient performance" would have been.
Seriously. I'll be waiting.
Quote:
And yes, it is stupid to Compare Nassib's performance to Geno's. You want to compare a 3rd round prospect to a #1 overall and act like that somehow validates Geno's game?
Yeah Nassib had a bad game. Uhm...so ****ing what? The fact that you want to compare the 4th-6th QB to be taken to Geno Smith does not do your argument any favors.
|
It is a completely valid comparison. WVU's pass defense was literally one of the very worst in college football. This is a game where Nassib should have ****ing raped them. Nassib was most likely the best passing QB that WVU saw all season long. It's not Geno versus Nassib. It's Nassib versus the WVU horrific pass defense. He should have put epic level numbers on that defense.
But, you know, he's only a borderline first rounder so his performance doesn't matter in the same exact situation, right?