Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinChief
DIRECT LINK IS IRRELEVANT.. to YOUR ARGUMENT.. are you ****ing reeruned???? NO REAL SITE WOULD SERVE VIDEO LIKE THAT... that leaves HTML5 an APP or FLASH...
|
Actually, Austin, it's irrelevant to any argument in this thread, yet you belabor the point. Here, I've taken the time to make it an embedded H264 file in a non-HTML5 page and it doesn't use flash.
http://kobrien15.webfactional.com/
Oh, look, it plays on iPod touch and iPad. Oh, look, it's not HTML5 nor is it flash. Oh, look, it's
NOT A DIRECT LINK.
Quote:
I am about to move this to the general board to show everyone ese what a tool you are being...
YOU SIMPLY HAVE NO ****ING CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
|
Please do. I have won every point in here aside from the technical aspects (H264 being codec, rather than plugin). I have Tech Crunch on my side. I have evidence from iPad, iPod and iPhone users.
But, please, go ahead.
Quote:
let's start with
A) you have no clue how a professional website is structured
B) you have no clue about even the basics of HTML5
C) you have no clue why from a business/resource perspective .. even if it gets decided that html5 will be H264... it will TAKE TIME to convert a majority of sites over... some of the big guys have the money to do so... MOST do not.
|
Let's start with:
A) We haven't even talked about structure. So, how would you know if I have a clue or not.
B) Again, fact not in evidence.
C) H264 is independent of HTML5. They aren't dependent on each other. Moreover, with Apple's products being the hit they are, sites are already converting or creating degrading pages. Thus, if we accept YOUR timeline of HTML adoption, sites will be predominately caught up already.
Feel free to actually QUOTE me with regards to A and B.
Quote:
|
I DO THIS FOR A LIVING AND HAVE FORGOTTEN MORE ABOUT THIS THAN YOU WILL EVER KNOW... and hearing you talk out of your ass about a topic you are CLEARLY lost on is getting tedious.
|
Quote:
|
If this argument is to continue I feel I'm going to have to teach you more than it is worth my time to get you up to speed to even be able to UNDERSTAND the context in which we SHOULD be speaking.
|
Aside from codec vs plugin, you've really done nothing. That's all I've learned because that's all you've been right about.
Quote:
|
SIMPLE FACT.. watch video on ipad = APP (I have explained a million times why this is an unstainable model to have 100s of apps for all the sites I frequent) or HTML5 (not deployed enough yet to be a factor) or direct links (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.... this is the one that you brought up and wow oh wow just proves that you are out of your element Donnie)
|
Simple fact: not true.
As evidenced by my above html page with embedded video, Silock's testimony as an iPad user, Tech Crunch's article, and a plethora of other users, writers, and developers, you are just wrong for suggesting a black and white world.
Direct links aren't even relevant to anyone's point. Especially not mine.