|
Hey Morphius,
Yeah, I must be a little slow on the uptake. It makes sense that there would be a lot of non-votes, that's for sure. Here's a link to a cnn.com "fact check" (so-called) about the undervote. It contains criticisms of claims made by both sides:
[url="http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/11/30/jackson.undervote/index.html"]http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/11/30/jackson.undervote/index.html[/url]
[This message has been edited by DanT (edited 11-30-2000).]
|