Thread: Chiefs DeCastro anyone?
View Single Post
Old 03-17-2012, 10:41 PM   #62
suds79 suds79 is offline
MVP
 
suds79's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $10005036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca View Post
I could sit here and argue all positions on offense are easy to fill other than QB, LT and WR...so should we be taking defense?
That's probably true about ease in filling. I was talking more about "importance". I still maintain it's tied for 3rd least at best on O.

Taking D? Probably. Could use a NT. Could use a pass rusher or a MLB.

Honestly more than anything, I'd prefer they trade down. If they're unable to do it and have to pick a guy? I'd really prefer they don't take Decastro but if they feel everybody else in positions that matter more would be too much of a reach, then I guess they're F-ed huh (from my prospective). Might as well take your guy.
Posts: 5,747
suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote